There’s a lot of talk about the “cheap player” in multiplayer video games. It’s a term that often refers to people who only play for the fun of it, or who don’t care about winning. But is this really the case? In some cases, it seems as if the “cheap player” is actually the best player. They’re able to get good results quickly and without investing too much time and effort. This is especially true in games like Call of Duty, Battlefield, and Halo. But what about other genres? Are there any players who are better at playing than others? And if so, why? There are a few reasons why some players may be better at multiplayer games than others. For one, they have more experience with the game. This means they’re more likely to know how to play well and get good results quickly. Additionally, they may have more money available to them, which can help them out when playing multiplayer games. Finally, they may be better at using teamwork skills to win games.
Today, he works in business (having purposely eschewed the arts for a more logical path), and I’m an idiot writer. The correlation is painfully obvious.
What it Means to Play Cheaply
Every video game has the perceived cheap manner of playing, the overt way to take advantage of the game’s basic programming. In hockey video games this meant always doing the one-timer, in football using the best team or playing with Tecmo Bo Jackson, and in basketball games always dunking or shooting from that one spot where the ball never seems to miss.
So that pixelated player, no matter how bad his rating, will probably score. Even when he enters the game’s locker room the other players taunt him.
“You know you only scored because of the awful code, right?” “Whatever,” he says, concealing a single tear.
Maybe you only use sniper rifles and hide on a hill in first-person shooters, or always go for the best weapons and spells in role-playing games. Whatever the genre, you are the designated cheap player, the one that causes your friends to shake their heads in constant disappointment.
In the same way that board game nights always feature the one person who takes it a little too seriously, video game gatherings have the one player who is always more interested in winning than everything else, like having fun, for instance.
Where Are They Now?
How this carries them through life always remains to be seen. But when you notice them playing that way, you seem to keep a distance, as if they’re the type of person who would kill and eat you on a deserted island. That’s also how I look at anyone who eats the last piece of bacon at breakfast.
Being a cheap video game player doesn’t necessarily mean you’re a bad person, just that you typically have an eye out for any loopholes, and sometimes aren’t the type to take the scenic route through life.
Perhaps it’s best to find a middle ground. Because the emphasis on constantly going for the original play may lead to an inability to score a simple goal or get a point or land a kill when you need one in the game. Winning is, after all, part of the point. You take too scenic of a route through life and you’ll never get anywhere.
What I’m trying to say is that I could kill my friend at that game today. There’s ultimately no shame in both being a little cheap and a tad creative here and there while playing video games.
Just be thankful that neither of you are the button masher. That guy’s probably in prison now.
